10 platitudes that seem regrettable
1. "Unfortunate event"
2. "Interesting point of view"
3. "Respectable public"
4. "Take steps"
5. "The turn of events"
6. "Innovative approach" (or "innovative approach")
7. "Prompt response"
8. "Irreconcilable"
9. "Arch enemy"
10. "No more time you stay"
Friday, February 27, 2009
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Jcpenney Salon Color Price
10 ingredients that I like in my pasta
1. Tomato
2. Tuna
3. Mushrooms
4. Olives
5. Salmon
5. Asparagus
7. Parmesan
8. Broccoli
9. Basil
10. And you.
1. Tomato
2. Tuna
3. Mushrooms
4. Olives
5. Salmon
5. Asparagus
7. Parmesan
8. Broccoli
9. Basil
10. And you.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Do Women Like Men With Smooth Genitals
10 Reasons why people did not comment on the previous post ...
1 .- The crisis is very hard ...
2 .- I have changed computer and did not have the url of the site.
3 .- I became a religion that forbids me to review websites.
4 .- I was angry with Coppelia and no longer a thing to be visiting her to participate.
5 .- I lost my fingers and it takes me navergar on the network.
6 .- Life is not worth anything ...
7 .- Did I mention the crisis and all?
8 .- I found another blog where they list how are you.
9 .- I a) married / b) divorced now) I moved / b) I returned to my parents' house where a) there is no / b) not let me use the computadore (select the options that will work.)
10 .- The truth is ... There is no reason not to continue feeding / reading / discussing / recommending this site, we Boys, girls!, comment ... do lists ... participate:)
Regards, Armando
.
1 .- The crisis is very hard ...
2 .- I have changed computer and did not have the url of the site.
3 .- I became a religion that forbids me to review websites.
4 .- I was angry with Coppelia and no longer a thing to be visiting her to participate.
5 .- I lost my fingers and it takes me navergar on the network.
6 .- Life is not worth anything ...
7 .- Did I mention the crisis and all?
8 .- I found another blog where they list how are you.
9 .- I a) married / b) divorced now) I moved / b) I returned to my parents' house where a) there is no / b) not let me use the computadore (select the options that will work.)
10 .- The truth is ... There is no reason not to continue feeding / reading / discussing / recommending this site, we Boys, girls!, comment ... do lists ... participate:)
Regards, Armando
.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Can People With Autism Drive
without Tardelitos February 14
As this site we have a tradition of respecting the traditions, until we aburrramos or forget - was pending post annual Valentine's Day and Love as has been done in the two previous February. But, as this time the crisis carried the green sponsorship Tardelitos , "the sweetest chocolates and guava" and, of course, the inspiration that brought endorsed, just let me, I abjure once and for all of the second person plural-the option of posting a poem and others and published. Before deciding on this visceral poem by Miguel Hernández, I tried to contact the two "poets in residence" of the blog, but Hubert Robertson was missing and the "Annotations on the travel notebook" as it calls his dark pieces, which sent me a few months ago and even posted one of them here, they were very dense and arcane as that date so clear and bright, as we all know, is the Valentine's Day and Love ( and sugar coma.) Jack Palans Bogarín Vindas, the other "partner", just before leaving the jail-again, two weeks ago sent me a sweet little piece entitled "The cone of the Poet", which for obvious reasons - and not-so- I think that is right for publication of a sublime solemnity.
! Happy day of love and friendship! (and the sugar coma).
LESS YOUR BELLY, the English poet Miguel Hernández.
As this site we have a tradition of respecting the traditions, until we aburrramos or forget - was pending post annual Valentine's Day and Love as has been done in the two previous February. But, as this time the crisis carried the green sponsorship Tardelitos , "the sweetest chocolates and guava" and, of course, the inspiration that brought endorsed, just let me, I abjure once and for all of the second person plural-the option of posting a poem and others and published. Before deciding on this visceral poem by Miguel Hernández, I tried to contact the two "poets in residence" of the blog, but Hubert Robertson was missing and the "Annotations on the travel notebook" as it calls his dark pieces, which sent me a few months ago and even posted one of them here, they were very dense and arcane as that date so clear and bright, as we all know, is the Valentine's Day and Love ( and sugar coma.) Jack Palans Bogarín Vindas, the other "partner", just before leaving the jail-again, two weeks ago sent me a sweet little piece entitled "The cone of the Poet", which for obvious reasons - and not-so- I think that is right for publication of a sublime solemnity. ! Happy day of love and friendship! (and the sugar coma).
LESS YOUR BELLY, the English poet Miguel Hernández.
Less your body, everything is confusing.
Less your body, everything is fleeting future, past barren, muddy.
Less your body, everything is hidden.
Less your body, all insecure, all last, dust free world.
Less your body, everything is dark.
thy womb Less clear and deep.
The post of February 2008 here:
https: / / www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=14874833&postID=8176985099064604916&pli=1
The post-February 2007:
https: / / www .blogger.com / comment.g? blog = 14874833 & postID = 117104285630216265
Eye The Lighthouse Bitacora www.heribertorodriguez.blogspot.com
Sunday, February 8, 2009
What Does The Different Coloured Shag Band Mean?
The extinction of monogamy
Monogamy not survive in the next thirty five years to disappear from society as an ideal. The concept is nothing more than a useful social convention that has rarely been observed in practice. So says the writer Jacques Attali published in the thirty-fifth anniversary special edition of Foreign Policy.
This, with which every day is building the future (what I'm doing discovery, today I feel like Boorstin says "discoverer"), is full of small revolutions no longer dream to be fought on barricades cobblestone street, but in the minds and consciences of human beings. The Third World War, which for some began a September 11, is not immune to a specific territory (some orderly starting a blitzkrieg on the first day fiscal year to fill neighboring states, for example) or by oil or water as they had anticipated some futurists (now obliged to pour a new future), the new great war is fought to occupy the consciousness, mind and belief of men human's conception of the world and celestial deities and pedestrians. The new war is a struggle for influence in the minds of most human beings. It is no coincidence that the greatest world power is itself the largest producer of content, icons, the "pundits" of "cultures" of scientists, experts in mass manipulation of Nobel prizes, the creators of movies, albums. How was that defeated the former Soviet Union and sought to succeed in the struggle for global dominance if your film production, recording, iconography was so bad, so-sin in mass culture-boring with the exception of Che Guevara, an icon where you look round. Still, Soviet theorists understood better than anyone the critical success factor in their struggle for hegemony: the need to win the battle of the minds of Westerners influenced by the increasingly relevant "mass culture", without But in general, were unable to reconcile the constraints imposed on personal freedom with the human creation of content for mass consumption drinking of those minds that were the target of their struggle for dominance. Yes, there was a centralized effort of the leaders of the Soviet state, even as a deep knowledge of the importance of this requirement gained support for their cause of hundreds of "compromised" creators of ideas and content. Once
hegemony is achieved a way of ensuring the continued dominance of their ideas are challenging the established order. Even with a preemptive strike prevalent ideas in the minds of the majority must constantly receive new stimuli and challenges that call into question, to make them change, modify, evolve according to, yes, the thread that runs from the dominant power. Foreign Policy magazine http://www.foreignpolicy.com/ used the occasion of his birthday to ask several experts on how to change their forecasts in the next thirty-five years the concepts of good and evil, beauty and horrible, acceptable and unacceptable.
In this special edition, the writer Jacques Attali dares to give his prediction for the future of relations between men and women. For him, monogamy will not survive in the coming years to disappear from society as an ideal. Abolished monogamy will not return to society polygamy, but stipulate a radically different conception of sentimental and romantic relationships, says Attali. The companies soon accepted as being valid relations with various partners who in turn will have with others. Does not contemplate the possibility that a person is formally allied with a group of people at once, mainly for economic reasons to maintain an orderly transmission of property, and that monogamy protects women against the excesses of men . Attali cites several trends to justify its challenge: the state intrusion into the lives of those disclosed in great detail the private lives with their truths Multiple lives and peers, the hypocrisy of society will be released more easily, increasing individual freedoms made possible changes in other areas previously unthinkable like gay marriage, the life expectancy getting higher make it harder to spend your life loving only one partner, the technological advances that continue to weaken the links between sexuality, love and reproduction. The abolition of monogamy will change all aspects of life, from financial issues, relationships with children and the state's role in relation to the family, all this change is already beginning to be visible behind Current hypocrisy reflected in books, movies, music, finally pontificates Attali.
The staff of "pundits" of opinion makers, icons continue to launch their ideas, is in the mind of the individual, and an increasingly more diverse, where ideas will fight its own battle to prevail, multiply like successful gene or disappear in the decidua trifle.
Monogamy not survive in the next thirty five years to disappear from society as an ideal. The concept is nothing more than a useful social convention that has rarely been observed in practice. So says the writer Jacques Attali published in the thirty-fifth anniversary special edition of Foreign Policy.
This, with which every day is building the future (what I'm doing discovery, today I feel like Boorstin says "discoverer"), is full of small revolutions no longer dream to be fought on barricades cobblestone street, but in the minds and consciences of human beings. The Third World War, which for some began a September 11, is not immune to a specific territory (some orderly starting a blitzkrieg on the first day fiscal year to fill neighboring states, for example) or by oil or water as they had anticipated some futurists (now obliged to pour a new future), the new great war is fought to occupy the consciousness, mind and belief of men human's conception of the world and celestial deities and pedestrians. The new war is a struggle for influence in the minds of most human beings. It is no coincidence that the greatest world power is itself the largest producer of content, icons, the "pundits" of "cultures" of scientists, experts in mass manipulation of Nobel prizes, the creators of movies, albums. How was that defeated the former Soviet Union and sought to succeed in the struggle for global dominance if your film production, recording, iconography was so bad, so-sin in mass culture-boring with the exception of Che Guevara, an icon where you look round. Still, Soviet theorists understood better than anyone the critical success factor in their struggle for hegemony: the need to win the battle of the minds of Westerners influenced by the increasingly relevant "mass culture", without But in general, were unable to reconcile the constraints imposed on personal freedom with the human creation of content for mass consumption drinking of those minds that were the target of their struggle for dominance. Yes, there was a centralized effort of the leaders of the Soviet state, even as a deep knowledge of the importance of this requirement gained support for their cause of hundreds of "compromised" creators of ideas and content. Once
hegemony is achieved a way of ensuring the continued dominance of their ideas are challenging the established order. Even with a preemptive strike prevalent ideas in the minds of the majority must constantly receive new stimuli and challenges that call into question, to make them change, modify, evolve according to, yes, the thread that runs from the dominant power. Foreign Policy magazine http://www.foreignpolicy.com/ used the occasion of his birthday to ask several experts on how to change their forecasts in the next thirty-five years the concepts of good and evil, beauty and horrible, acceptable and unacceptable.
In this special edition, the writer Jacques Attali dares to give his prediction for the future of relations between men and women. For him, monogamy will not survive in the coming years to disappear from society as an ideal. Abolished monogamy will not return to society polygamy, but stipulate a radically different conception of sentimental and romantic relationships, says Attali. The companies soon accepted as being valid relations with various partners who in turn will have with others. Does not contemplate the possibility that a person is formally allied with a group of people at once, mainly for economic reasons to maintain an orderly transmission of property, and that monogamy protects women against the excesses of men . Attali cites several trends to justify its challenge: the state intrusion into the lives of those disclosed in great detail the private lives with their truths Multiple lives and peers, the hypocrisy of society will be released more easily, increasing individual freedoms made possible changes in other areas previously unthinkable like gay marriage, the life expectancy getting higher make it harder to spend your life loving only one partner, the technological advances that continue to weaken the links between sexuality, love and reproduction. The abolition of monogamy will change all aspects of life, from financial issues, relationships with children and the state's role in relation to the family, all this change is already beginning to be visible behind Current hypocrisy reflected in books, movies, music, finally pontificates Attali.
The staff of "pundits" of opinion makers, icons continue to launch their ideas, is in the mind of the individual, and an increasingly more diverse, where ideas will fight its own battle to prevail, multiply like successful gene or disappear in the decidua trifle.
Eye The Lighthouse Bitacora www.heribertorodriguez.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)