The reason there is proof that God
If logical possibility means an absence of contradiction, then an idea that is contradictory in itself (like a square circle) is logically impossible and meaningless to speak of "possible" object denoted by an im-possible idea . Now, the idea of \u200b\u200bGod as understood by the Catholic theodicy, it is impossible to be contradictory attributes assigned to it (a gift), and if the idea is impossible, ergo God does not show existecomo step below
Myth 1: God as a person. Critical : It is impossible that a being is a person defined as infinite, since it is a finite attribute finite beings and if so extrasolar the infinite personality is distorted and disappear. If God is defined as transcendent or outside space and time can not be a person, because it takes place in a context of space-teporal.Tampoco staff may be one who, by definition spiritual, can not be corporeal as are real people.
Myth 2: Triune God. Critical : A single God while triple is a violation of logical principles of non-contradiction and identity, ergo it is impossible.
Myth 3: God as absolutely simple. Critical : There is nothing in this material world that is quite simple and without parts that co-determine. A simple God would dimension 0, but that contradicts the idea that it is infinite and is everywhere in the space of this universe.
Myth 4: God as omniscient. Critical : an omniscient being is impossible in a universe governed by deterministic chaos systems, but unpredictable in the long term. An omniscient God contradicts the supposed free will, because if God knows everything, ergo everything that we determine in life with which it would defeat the supposed free albedrío.Si God knows everything, ergo it implies that knowledge has not only theoretical but also practical, and if so God can do things such as, for example, stab someone, but for God knows that it is necessary to have body and you feel a homicidal rage, which compromise their spiritual heritage and its goodness. Then the idea of \u200b\u200binfinite wisdom is autoaniquilante.
Myth 5: God as omnipotent. Critical : It contradicts the supposed omnipotence of God with the existence of evil in the world as if it really is omnipotent then would end once and for all with the evils, but as they do is because the tolerated and allows suggesting that God is complicit in the evil that contradicts his goodness. An omnipotent God requires an infinite number of things over which we exercise that power infinite, but since there is such a quantity of things, ergo the idea of \u200b\u200bomnipotence is absurd.
Myth 6: God as an absolute consciousness. Critical : If God is an absolute, ergo God can not interact with other beings, since in that case is not absolute but relative. Consciousness is a subject-object, ergo it is impossible for God all be aware, because if it is would be for their existence contradicts what God absoluta.Si is infinite can not be conscious, since consciousness is consciousness of something that makes it finite, and an infinite swamp objects and therefore could not be conscious of something external to it. Consciousness is a state or bodily function of the brain, but if we define God as immaterial, ergo can not have consciousness.
Myth 7: God as infinitely good. Critical : the absolute goodness of God is at odds with the evil and cruelty that abound in this world supposedly created. The good God is inconsistent with the fair, as the good less than they should punish the guilty and punish him just as much as due (or less or more). Only limbic system agencies may have feelings like kindness, but as God is defined as an immaterial spirit, ergo can not have feelings. If God is a perfect being who has everything and nothing is missing, then you can not have feelings that involve a desire for something that is lacking.
Myth 8: God creating the world and mankind. Critical : If God has absolute existence, ergo God can not create the world, as cretion is a relationship between the creator and the created and God is related to the world is not absolute but relative. An absolutely perfect and necessary God is not comparable with the world and absolute perfection of all beings cancel imperfect and imperfect world would disappear, but as the world exists that there is Dios.Un God creator of men is at odds with free will, because if God made "free", ergo God made their existence, but not the substance that drives them to do good or evil, but as an existence without essence is impossible, then God did not free men, but as mere automata determined by the omniscience and divine providence, which debunks the supposed free will.
Myth 9: God as giver of free will. Critical : If God is omniscient and provident God predetermined ergo everything beforehand, then this contradicts the supposed free will "freedom from want" metafísicos.Si of free will God gave his creatures, then were given a choice of evil and error, but as the wrong choice did not exist before God could only be created by him and therefore, God is imperfect perfection contradicting absoluta.Si God gives the power to choose good and evil, whence came evil? evil could not exist before or outside of an eternal and infinite, therefore, could only come from God to be evil, therefore the power to choose evil or free will contradicts the absolute goodness of God.
Myth 10: God as timeless. Critical : If God is timeless, ergo can not be aware that occurs in the temporal evolution. If God is timeless person can not be developed in a temporal context. If God is timeless can not be eternal, since eternity is nothing but an infinite time not a time 0 or a "before" God is timeless tiempo.Si could not create the world "before" him, since all "before" and "after" presuppose the time.
Myth 11: spaceless God. Critical : If God is spaceless, can not be infinite, because it could not be everywhere in the universe or God is spaceless be ubícuo.Si can not have consciousness is a subject-object = space. If God is spaceless can not be a person living in a "place" God is spaceless dado.Si could not create the world and all creation = creator-creature relationship and every relationship is real space.
0 comments:
Post a Comment