1-Non sequitur fallacy: from the premise not the conclusion follows, since there is no logical connection between them. "Fabric comes from the time of Christ because it found traces of pollen and plants from the Middle East. "criticism: so what?, also in the Middle Ages had the pollen and the plants of the Near East that could adhere to a fabric of the area that later was exported to Europe.
2-Fallacy blatant lie: "The symposium did not resolve the controversy over the age of the shroud to recognize the regularity of carbon-14 tests carried out in 1988, under which indicated the shroud dated from the Middle Ages . But he added that we should not rule out a possible contamination of the fabric that has been distorting the results. "criticism: Here lies the lie to pretend that pollution invalidate the results of the analysis of carbon 14 in the 3 laboratories that led out, in circumstances that these 3 laboratories CLEAN TEST BEFORE, WITH DIFFERENT Technically, all traces of impurities, LIPIDS, ETC. YOU MAY HAVE THE Shroud, which is a standard procedure that applies before any dating any sample to be tested in any laboratory in the world.
3-Fallacy of begging the dispute or begging the question:
ej1: "However, scientists could not explain this phenomenon, a fact that makes me doubt the scientific canons, because if I refer to science, all people to die emanate an energy similar to that of the holy sheet, but with less intensity than that found in the shroud. "criticism: what type of energy emitted all meats when stretching the leg? what frequency, wavelength and intensity is the mysterious "energy"? what part of the electromagnetic spectrum that enigmatic figure "energy"? what "science" supports the existence of this "energy" post- mortem and what evidence has to support it? "or will the chatter about this charlatan who confuse science with pseudo-scientific charlatans and tomfoolery like him?.
ej2: "it is estimated that, for example, 10% of the weight of the sheet corresponds to organic matter added to it over the centuries, and the presence of an unknown radiation that altered the genuine carbon percentages of flax, and factors such as Chambéry fire, leading to melting of the silver chest containing her canvas and that upset the purity of the samples. "criticism: It was noted that samples of the Shroud of Turin were washed with different techniques and products (hydrochloric acid, oh Na, detergents, ultrasonic bath, etc..), ergo it is wrong to say that the sample was not cleaned of organic matter or ash and other impurities result of fire in Chambéry and therefore , is a lie that they "upset the purity of the samples. but what's really neat is to defend the supposed authenticity of the cloth entering the blunder that" radiation unknown "(sic) would upset the purity of the samples. how do you know that the cloth was affected by an" unknown radiation "if the allegedly was ... unknown such radiation? What empirical evidence is of such" unknown radiation? what if it was "unknown" how do we know if it was a "radiation" and not a "ectoplasm" (Pegasus type of "Ghostbusters") or a "slime psicomagnotérico" (Ghostbusters II) and perhaps they? what frequency, wavelength and intensity is that blessed "unknown radiation? what takes place in the electromagnetic spectrum? Or is it that sits on the spectrum ... Spooky ghosts?. All the foolishness of radiation "unknown" (I'm starting to listen to the tune of the series "Twilight Zone", kids) to test the supposed mystery of the Shroud trick reminds me of the pseudo-ufo-crazy trying to explain the Of course pseudo-mystery of UFOs with the equally mysterious and for-abnormal pseudoscientific theory that UFOs are teleplasty and ideoplastias (networked the terminachos macaneros) issued by paragnostas equipped with psychokinetic powers ... (re-sic). In other words, to defend a club (ufology) resort to another baton (parapsychology), in the same way that sindonólogos to defend the holy wool fetish pseudoscience STURP sindonologa of appeals to the club of the unknown para-abnormal radiation. Truly sublime.
EJ3: "In 1988, according to some authors the journal Science report something funny: for example, thanks to radiocarbon dating, some snails" live "subject to this measure have yielded an age of 26,000 years. On another occasion had set the age of a freshly killed seals in 1,300 years. More examples, the journal Radiocarbon warned of the dangers of this form of dating, and provided another plausible example, a mammoth that had existed 26,000 years ago had a dating from 5,600 years. And what to think even the incident experienced by the laboratory director of Zurich-one, one of those charged with studying the Shroud, when referring a tablecloth of her mother to carbon-14 found with astonishment that yielded a four centuries old. "Review: Al Apparently this moron does not know that carbon 14 dating should only be applied to inert things, not snails living or freshly dead seals. even the logic of that whistleblowers should say that the meter does not work, because it does not measure ... the weight of something (sic). With respect to the mammoth how he knew that had 26,000 years? not be using the same method of carbon-14 made from different laboratories to eliminate possible margins Error?: precisely why the analysis of the Turin cloth was made in 3 laboratories, not just one, because if one is made mistakes can occur (the science is not perfect, nor that humans do) the which are reduced when the analysis is performed in more laboratories where there is the possibility of contrasting resultados.Lo likely that these errors are due to be outlined that this principle failed to replication of measurements and results by different researchers, which is basic sciences. That's it. The rest is to carry water to the mill of dementia of fanaticones STURP Catholics.
0 comments:
Post a Comment