The mezclapalabras Heidegger, with its peculiar jargon superkalifragilisticaespialirosa, spat the following pearls worthy of a ... Cantinflas (only dazzle unsuspecting troll brainless as "trinitarian" Acevedo = be = thinker): - "above all" is "is to be "(bright tautology as empty as the worm's brain this thing) .-" In the body happens to be the annihilation of nothing "(no doubt that that sentence makes no sense" stunned "to anyone who has a normal brain , which is not the case that chupaflautas and sectarian) - "There are (ex-sist) means: to be holding into nothingness" (it shows not only that little phrase says nothing, but also betrays no matter gray is this scribbler, whose filosofastrería holds ... at all, precisely)
Now, talking seriously and fry mandadando macaques to Africa ... the apartheid both Heidegger and the Nazi windbag "Nazi Mapuche" (contradiction in terms ) Acevedo, regarding the term "being" Kant says: "Being is evidently not a real predicate, ie a concept of something that can be added to the concept of a thing. It is simply the position of a thing or of certain determinations itself. The only logical use of the mating trial. " Indeed, "being" is a simple copula (preaching) that was transformed into a noun from absolute and metaphysical the time of Parmenides, but noun a verb is committing the sin of reification or conceptual fallacy hypostatization which, awkwardly, making the pataphysical SIGEN Heidegger and his followers as to what their rickety and few neurons are not allowed to learn that the verb-noun be saying "being is" is as absurd as a noun other verbs and write the boobs, "walking the walk", "writing type" or "the baton (with Heidegger nonsense) macanea. With respect to the" existence " (or "ex-sistence" according to the mutilation of the language of the calibration chiripitiflautica Heidegger), B. Russell says: "If such a thing exists, and 'x' is this or that, say 'X exists' is meaningless. Thus the existence, in the sense attributed to simple features, is completely removed from the list of basics. We find that the ontological argument and most of his refutations depend on grammatical errors. "So, Russell, following Kant tells us that there is not a true predicate and that the alleged" proof "of God is not ontological more than a sophistical trick, since it is impossible to infer a real existence of a simple analytical definition of God because, as demonstrated by Kant: "every existential proposition is synthetic" and is a non sequitur to derive a synthetic conclusion of an analytical premise ( Reichenbach). In fact, modern quantificational logic gives reason to Kant, because, as Jorge Estrella tells us: "The solution ruselliana to render meaningless the formula 'x exists', due to the fact already pointed out that the notion of existence is not verifiable predicate. Therefore, the syntax generated to signify existence ('(Ex) Fx', for example) requires the condition that the object in question (a case of replacing 'x') has another ( or other) property (substitution of 'F'). The notion of existence marked by the existential operator '(Ex)' refers only to that: the attribution of a property (other than 'exist') to an object determined. "Morale: follow the wise counsel of Hume and burn in a fire at all tomes pataphysical say prayers only pointless and banal tautologies, such as Hitler's Gauleiter nonsense of "Herr" Heidegger, and read the great philosophers: Hume, Kant, Diderot , Russell, etc. and study logic and science, if only to not make a fool as chantas Heidegger as a thinker troll chilote Acevedo = = be = anything ... brains, which, by their vomiting stated in the network, proved to be a faithful reflection of the low test scores SIMCE and illiteracy afflicts chilotes pseudo-students, but do not worry, acevedito, see that maybe you can idiocy and imbecility be very useful for brain Nazi skinheads (NSP), as dumb as you are very useful for the lively they're going to milk and do not give you work as a Chinese or a (whether of a sect or right as the Opus the new Acropolis) and you future slavery at the hands of a Nazi messiah, I have no doubt ezel "wise" purpose for which you were created by God .... = be = anything ... holy trinity corresponds Hegelian with psychopathic Trinity chilota acevedo = be = thinker ... is it that this crazy insane "shit's mate" is believed triune God or do I put the names are just the result of mental disease of "multiple personalities" that mariguanero mongolito have it? oh, is there a madhouse out there for chilanga acevedo takes the fresh wind to the nearest mental hospital, please? look it gives comemaní ape embarrassment, kids.
Bibliography, "Letter on Humanism" in Martin Heidegger .- "What is metaphysics" of Martin Heidegger .- "Critique of Pure Reason Immanuel Kant .-" Logical Atomism "by Bertrand Russell .-" scientific philosophy " Hans Reichenbach .- "Science and Philosophy" Jorge Estrella.
0 comments:
Post a Comment